Friday, July 29, 2011

Making Money Web


iSwifter, the company that can stream Flash-based Facebook games so they can be played on the iPad, said that users have downloaded the iSwifter app more than half a million times since the launch of version 3.0 in June and (updated) version 4.0 more recently.


That’s a strong start for a technology that circumvents Apple’s walled garden on the iPad, allowing Facebook and other Flash content to run properly on the tablet. Normally, Adobe Flash games (which are ubiquitous on the web) don’t run on Apple’s iPad, thanks to a technical dispute between the companies. But after a period of negotiation with Apple, iSwifter made it impossible possible with the launch of version 3.0 of its app, which comes with a subscription-based game browser.


iSwifter executes games on its own servers and then streams images to a user’s iPad in the form of a video. The execution is so quick, the user never knows the game is running in a server, not on the iPad itself.


Peter Relan, chairman of Youweb — the incubator that owns iSwifter — is making the announcement today at the GamesBeat 2011 conference in San Francisco. 500,000 people are playing nearly 2,000 Facebook games available on the iSwifter game browser. About 40 percent of all gaming time on iSwifter is spent on Zynga games. This shows that users are not waiting for Zynga and other Facebook game makers to adapt their games to run on the iPad.


That’s an interesting notion, Relan says, because the company charges a subscription fee for iSwifter. Zynga games, meanwhile, are free-to-play. That is, users play them for free and pay real money for virtual goods. But with iSwifter, Zynga players are actually willing to pay money so they can play Zynga games on the go on an iPad. About 20 percent of iSwifter users are willing to pay using in-app purchases to get access to a Facebook game on the iPad. And iSwifter users spent nearly 2 million minutes on Facebook games in the past few months (using earlier versions of iSwifter).


The most popular Facebook games on iSwifter are Zynga’s CityVille and Empires & Allies. Other top 10 games include FrontierVille, Dragons of Atlantis, Gardens of Tim, Backyard Monsters and SlotoMania.


iSwifter CEO Rajat Gupta said the company’s success shows that disruption is occurring in mobile games, where portals such as iSwifter, making it harder for social game publishers to lock their customers on certain platforms.


“While we hear the Facebook app for the iPad is coming soon, we know it won’t include the ability to play games,” said Gupta. “Almost all the big games on Facebook are built in Flash, which doesn’t run on iOS. But iSwifter has created a large following of paying users who love playing Facebook games on their iPads.”


With iSwifter’s game-browser app, iPad users can log into online games like World of Warcraft or play social games such as CityVille on their iPads, even though those games aren’t playable on Apple’s device in any other way.


Users can get the iSwifter app with a regular web browser that can play Flash videos and other web content on an iPad for a subscription of $4.99 a month a flat fee of $4.99 Both deliver Flash and game content — including any social games or massively multiplayer online games.


The first couple of versions of iSwifter let users to watch videos and play a limited number of Flash games on an iPad. But version 3.0 allows you to log into Facebook and play a variety of Flash-based games such as FarmVille, Gupta said in an interview.


Apple approved the previous versions of iSwifter without much interchange. But the 3.0 approval process was lengthier and tougher because iSwifter introduced a new monetization feature. Gupta said he wanted to launch a subscription service where a user would sign up once for iSwifter and the subscription would automatically renew at the end of each month. But Apple balked and required that iSwifter’s users approve the subscription at the end of every month. That way, users won’t get surprised by monthly bills. It isn’t exactly clear why Apple required this restriction for iSwifter, but Gupta said he had to go along. Now, to reduce confusion, iSwifter has eliminated the subscriptions in favor of a single download fee. With version 4.0, users can download it for free and play it for a half hour. If they like it, they can pay the flat fee.


When you load the app, you have two options. You can browse web sites or play games. With the web sites, you can choose from one of the featured links or just type in the web address to go to any web site. For games, there is one game that is available for free each week. The others are available as free-to-play games. After a couple of minutes of playing, the user is prompted to make an in-app purchase to continue playing. If there is a drawback to iSwifter, it is that it needs a constant Wi-Fi connection in order to run, as the video has to be streamed in near real-time to create a continuous and good experience for the user. Gupta says that the amount of bandwidth required to support the app isn’t huge.


Gupta says that iSwifter would be useful on Android systems as well, even though Flash is going to be available on those devices. That’s because all of the capabilities of Flash aren’t available on those devices. Right now, iSwifter runs on just the iPad.


It’s worth noting that many Flash web sites are written for PCs and need a mouse and keyboard. That means they won’t work well on a mobile device unless they are redone in a touchscreen-friendly way. But iSwifter has built software — an abstraction layer built into the cloud platform — that captures a user’s touch-based gestures and converts them into mouse and keyboard-style inputs that Flash games can understand. That conversion is done in real-time.


Developers who have free-to-play games may be particularly interested in making their games accessible via iSwifter 4.0. That’s because iSwifter can extend distribution for the web-based games to the Apple platform. If users buy virtual goods in those games, the developers can make money from the purchases. Apple still gets paid, meanwhile, because it gets 30 percent of the revenue from subscription fees generated by iSwifter, per Apple’s business rules.


The iSwifter browser competes with the Skyfire browser, which costs $4.99 on the iPad. But the Skyfire browser isn’t really built to handle games or Flash animations, particularly since it can’t convert finger touches into mouse clicks.




Next Story: Study: Mobile payments expected to be mainstream by 2013? Previous Story: RIM says 7 smartphones with new OS are coming soon







Mobile gaming is the wide-open battleground of the entertainment industry. While Zynga dominates social games and big publishers rule console games, the global smartphone game market is still up for grabs.


Since there are potentially billions of users in this market, mobile gaming could become the largest game market of them all. Who will win it?


Smartphone games have been growing as a market since 2007, when Apple’s iPhone debuted. Tablet games have been growing since the spring of 2010, when Apple launched the iPad. Now the fastest-growing mobile market is based on devices running the Android operating system. With triggering events such as the success of Angry Birds, the hit Rovio game that has been downloaded more than 200 million times, mobile game companies are raising tens of millions of dollars. Mobile game companies have garnered significant valuations, particularly overseas.


Tim Merel, managing director at Digi-Capital, says, “The time to act is now.”


The potential of mobile games


Mobile games could be a $13 billion market in 2014, according to Merel. Mobile and online games together could be a $44 billion market, or 50 percent of the global $87 billion market in 2014. Today, mobile games are around $8 billion, a small slice of the overall game market, which is still dominated by console games, web games, and Facebook games. (IDC estimates mobile games will grow to $5 billion in a few years; Gartner says that mobile gaming was $6.7 billion, or 10 percent of the $67.4 billion game market in 2010; the estimates vary, but few doubt mobile games will have a great growth rate).


How will a huge mobile game market come about? That’s one of the questions we’ll explore at GamesBeat 2011 on Tuesday and Wednesday at the Palace Hotel in San Francisco. We’ve got 80 of the game industry’s finest minds focused on the evolution of mobile gaming. We all want to figure out how to connect the dots in mobile games.


Backlash to the hype


The cynics among us shudder at the hype. Some companies that dove in too early found there wasn’t enough water in the swimming pool. That is, the ecosystem hasn’t been fully mature in the past. It’s a market where lots of companies have tried to succeed, but very few can claim successes. For every Angry Birds, there are thousands of failures. The tale has been similar for other gaming bubbles in virtual worlds, feature cell phone games, and casual web games.


Mobile gaming nirvana isn’t here yet. Platform owners such as Apple have made changes that have disrupted the businesses of game makers, such as when Apple recently banned certain incentives for marketing games. The Android ecosystem is fragmented and not as mature when it comes to making money. And other platforms are still fairly weak in terms of a proven ability to generate revenues.


Still, it would be foolish for game companies to avoid investing in mobile games, for fear that they might get more scars. Those who invest and fail and learn are the ones that get ahead. There was a lot of chaos and friction in the early days of Facebook as well. But that eventually turned into a solid platform for making money. The mobile ecosystem is maturing as well. There is plenty of evidence to point to progress on this front. It always takes a few years of trial and error before an investment pays off.


Nintendo and Sony once ruled mobile games via devices such as the Nintendo DS and the PlayStation Portable. But Apple has busted the market open with more than 200 million iOS devices sold since 2007. There are more than 425,000 iPhone apps and 100,000 native iPad apps that have been downloaded more than 15 billion times. That shows that the barriers to entry in mobile games have been lowered so that almost anyone can enter. Small developers such as Dave Castelnuovo’s Bolt Creative — maker of Pocket God — have sold millions of units. Big hits have emerged such as Tiny Wings, Talking Friends, Angry Birds, Infinity Blade and other titles. Apple has paid $2.5 billion to its developers to date.


But the competition is also nightmarish. The average revenue per app is about $5,882. That’s not enough to support the huge ecosystem of developers chasing the market, let alone big companies. Nintendo CEO Satoru Iwata (pictured holding the Nintendo 3DS) said in March that the presence of so much free and $1 software (the average mobile game price is $1.05) in the smartphone games market isn’t healthy and is a primary reason Nintendo is avoiding the market.


Trip Hawkins (pictured right), chief executive of Digital Chocolate, has also warned that the glut of games on the smartphone platforms means game developers will find it hard to make money, noting that the average revenue per game doesn’t even pay for a really good foosball table. Too much junk can ruin the market for everyone and make it hard for consumers to find the good games, resulting in a lot of bad experiences in mobile games. Today, there are 64,048 games on the App Store, including 291 new ones a day. The cost of making these games is in the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars, a lot less than the multimillion-dollar console game budgets.


Making the right and wrong choices


By comparison, Zynga is bringing in $235 million per quarter with a base of 232 million monthly active users for its Facebook games. With 600 million users, Facebook is a smaller market than the worldwide mobile phone market. The land grab in social games took place from 2007 to 2009. The result is that Zynga has more users on Facebook than the next 15 rivals. That has positioned the company to go public, raising $1 billion or more in an offering that is expected to value Zynga at $20 billion.


That is how the market rewards companies that pioneer a new market in games and come to dominate it — at the right time. Will the same thing happen again in mobile? Social Gaming Network, which once looked more promising than Zynga in both social games and mobile games, shifted into iPhone games early on, abandoning Facebook games. That turned out to be the wrong move. MindJolt recently acquired SGN for an undisclosed price, but SGN was definitely far less valuable than Zynga by the time it sold out.


The interesting thing here is that Facebook has crushed a lot of its competition. Now both Facebook and Zynga are reaping the rewards. With mobile, Apple faces a bruising fight with Android, which has begun to win the race in terms of numbers of phone activations. The fierce competition is driving the mobile market forward at a faster pace, and that should result in a faster growing mobile games market. Android app downloads have crossed 5 billion, and there are about 40,000 games on Android now. The result is a spiral of competition, where Android and Apple are propelling each other forward at faster and faster rates.


At some point, the numbers game won’t matter. The platform that wins won’t be the one with the most apps. It will be the one with the most retention of users and the most engagement. As Bing Gordon, a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, said at our last DiscoveryBeat conference, a developer’s job is not to get a first date, or a second date with a gamer. It is to get an anniversary.


The necessity of investing in the future


Some companies have invested a lot of money early to be out front in this fight. Electronic Arts bought Jamdat, a maker of games for feature cell phones, for $680 million in 2005. It used that position to ready itself for an even bigger mobile game market with the debut of smartphone games. EA now has some of the biggest grossing iPhone apps of all time, including Tetris, which has had more than 132 million paid downloads to date.


Other players that have made big investments include Gameloft, Rovio (it made 52 mobile games before Angry Birds took off), Ngmoco, Digital Chocolate, PopCap Games, Glu Mobile, GameHouse, Capcom, and Disney Mobile. Successful startups in mobile include Storm8, Pocket Gems, TinyCo, Craneball Studios, Gameview Studios (part of DeNA), Sunstorm Interactive, Backflip Studios and Outfit7.


John Carmack, one of the world’s greatest graphics experts and game designers, says that it is unquestionable that mobile gaming technology will surpass the current consoles within two years.


Distribution and discovery matter


These companies are building up user bases that can become distribution networks for future games. Recognizing that it has distribution power, TinyCo has started a $5 million fund to invest in small developers to help them launch their games. Why would a game company raise $18 million and turn around and invest $5 million in others? It is leveraging its newfound distribution power.


The distribution power is what the game developers need in order to stand out from the nightmarish competition. How to get your game discovered in a sea of content is still an unsolved problem. The problem of discovery gave rise to mobile social networks such as OpenFeint, which offer tools to socialize a game with achievements, leaderboards, and friend competitions. In Japan, DeNA became a billion-dollar company because tens of millions of Japanese phone users used DeNA’s Mobage network to find games.


But in the U.S., the mobile social networks have not yet become billion-dollar companies. Still, the potential is there. That is why DeNA, benefiting from its strong base in Japan, was able to buy Ngmoco for $403 million. That seemed like an extravagant price to pay for Ngmoco, but DeNA saw a chance to become a worldwide global player in mobile social networks. Gree, DeNA’s rival in Japan, had to step up on the global stage as well and it acquired OpenFeint for $104 million. Ngmoco’s Neil Young believes that the billion-dollar companies will be created in the mobile social network space in the next couple of years because of the discovery problem.


Beyond the mobile social networks, all sorts of supporting companies are attacking the discovery issue. Tapjoy is promoting games through its own powerful marketing networks. Applifier is adapting its Facebook promotion bar to mobile. Getjar is offering strategic placement in its app store to promote games. Even American Express, Paypal, Zong, Visa and other payment companies will get in on the act, finding ways to eliminate the friction in paying for mobile games so an ever-wider audience can enjoy them.


The investment juggernaut


Game companies raised $1.05 billion in 2010, up 58 percent from a year earlier. Only four of the top 20 companies on that list last year were mobile companies. This year, Zynga alone could raise more than $1 billion in one fell swoop with its expected initial public offering.


But now we’re seeing investors who are embracing mobile-first strategies, where game companies lead with mobile games. The momentum of this investment into mobile is clearly growing.


TinyCo raised $18 million. Digital Chocolate raised $12 million. Pocket Gems raised $5 million. Rovio raised $42 million. The investors are also getting more interesting: Accel Partners, Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia Capital and Marc Andreessen are all moving into the market. Storm8 hasn’t raised money, but it is generating considerable revenue, having recently reported its first $1 million revenue day.


This heavy investment is aiding and abetting a talent migration, as veteran game developers see more opportunity in mobile games and other digital arts. Jordan Weisman, who has made every kind of game imaginable from the Mech Warrior series to alternate reality games, recently started his own new mobile and social games startup, Harebrained Schemes. The Seattle company is creating Crimson, an iPhone game as the first game to be published by Bungie — maker of the Halo series of games — under its brand new Bungie Aerospace third-party publishing division. Asked why he did this, Weisman said that he’s old and doesn’t have too many more games left to make. The idea of taking a few years to work on one game just isn’t attractive to him; but the short cycles of mobile games changes that clock for him. Lured by the chance of riches or similar ambitions, there’s a whole generation of talent migrating to mobile games now.


Free-to-play paves the way


Free-to-play gaming has helped pave the way for a real business model in mobile games. Apple introduced in-app purchases — the ability to buy something such as a virtual good without leaving an app — in the fall of 2009. Google introduced in-app purchases this summer. On the App Store, about 65 percent of the revenue from the top-grossing games now comes from free-to-play games, according to mobile analytics firm Flurry. Back in January, only 39 percent of the revenue from the top 100 games were free-to-play. Separately, Xyologic reported in March that 40 percent of game downloads were free-to-play games.


That has drawn bigger companies such as Zynga, which recently launched CityVille Hometown on the iPhone. Last year, Zynga paid $53.3 million to acquire mobile game maker Newtoy, creator of Words With Friends, a hit Scrabble-like game. Zynga is acquiring mobile game companies regularly now, and it has 11 games on mobile phones.


But for every endorsement of the mobile game market, there is a setback. Apple wounded its own market in April when it abruptly cut off pay-per-install marketing, where developers paid marketers such as Tapjoy to offer incentives to users to install other apps. Apple felt that developers were buying their way onto the top 25 lists. That’s driving companies such as Storm8 to expand on Android. The effect is that it has become harder to launch new games which go on to be a top hit, said Matthaus Krzykowski, founder of app store search firm Xyologic and a frequent VentureBeat contributor.


The path to the future


But there’s hope that mobile games will become a great market. Nielsen Research says that games continue to be the most popular category for apps. About 93 percent of app downloaders are willing to pay for games that they play. On average, mobile gamers play 7.8 hours a month, while iPhone users in particular play 14.7 hours a month. In Japan and Europe, mobile game usage is huge, and it is growing in the U.S. A survey by PopCap said a third of U.S. and U.K. adults have played a mobile game in the past month.


Tablet games are likely to take the market in a new direction. Companies such as OnLive are streaming high-quality PC games onto tablets such as the iPad 2. With game-streaming, the power of the hardware for the mobile device doesn’t matter. Games are stored and executed in a distant server, and video is sent down to the user’s machine, which can display the video whether it running on a PC or a tablet or, eventually, a smartphone.


Rob Wyatt, chief scientist of game-streaming firm Otoy, believes that game streaming could make consoles obsolete, allowing devices of any kind to run high-quality games. Cloud-based games will require good wireless connections to keep the two-way stream from being interrupted, but that technology is in the works. Steve Perlman at OnLive is working on something called Dido that will have virtually unlimited bandwidth for delivering high-speed data to wireless users. It sounds crazy, but OnLive itself seemed crazy two years ago. Now it works.


Meanwhile, many game companies are beginning to adapt online web games so they run on tablets, with routines added to support touchscreen or accelerometer controls. The tablet market may be an even bigger free-for-all, as both smartphone game makers and PC/console/web game makers can target the platform.


Sony and Nintendo, meanwhile, are doubling down on their investments in mobile games at the high end to make sure that Apple and Android devices don’t steal their high-value customers. Nintendo launched glasses-free 3D viewing on the 3DS in March, and Sony is preparing to launch the PlayStation Vita handheld with console-like graphics this fall. Nintendo’s Iwata insists that the company won’t be doing smartphone games.


HTML5 vs Native apps


Another factor that will affect the future of mobile games is HTML5, the new lingua franca for mobile and web apps that allows a game written in the format to run on a variety of platforms and devices. Digital Chocolate’s Hawkins believes that the arrival of HTML5-based mobile browsers will set game companies free from the restrictions of app stores.


HTML5 games run fairly slowly right now, so native apps, or those designed to run on specific devices, perform the fastest. But that could change over time as developers learn how to fine-tune their games.The latest approach to doing this is the “hybrid app,” which is a native app that runs all of its components in a browser. The fastest games must still be coded in native formats, but that could change. The game engine makers and other tool makers may figure out how to make cross-platform games.


With games running in the browser, users won’t be dependent entirely on purchasing apps from app stores, which take a 30 percent cut. That would complete the revolution that began with the creation of the app store concept, which bypassed the gatekeeper carriers who previously had control over which apps were available for purchase. When the app store owners lose control themselves, content will be free. And that, Hawkins argues, will lead to a $100 billion game industry.


Whether that happens or not, it’s a rosy future for mobile games. At our conference in a couple of days, you’ll hear people from across this entire spectrum — from people like Atari founder Nolan Bushnell to technologists creating the future such as Otoy’s Rob Wyatt. We hope you’ll join us.


We’ll be exploring the most disruptive game technologies and business models at our third annual GamesBeat 2011 conference, on July 12-13 at the Palace Hotel in San Francisco. It will focus on the disruptive trends in the mobile games market. GamesBeat is co-located with our MobileBeat 2011conference this year. To register, click on this link. Sponsors can message us at sponsors@venturebeat.com.

Our sponsors include Qualcomm, Flurry, Greystripe, Nexage, Tapjoy, FunMobility, TriNet, Zong, Sibblingz, OpenFeint, Spil Games and

WildTangent.




Next Story: Groupon changes privacy statement, merchants have free reign Previous Story: Google on today’s massive Google+ spam influx: “We ran out of disk space”







surface encounters reviews url

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters reviews url surface encounters reviews url

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters review surl

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters complaints surface encounters complaints

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters complaints surface encounters complaints

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters macomb mi surface encounters macomb mi

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters macomb mi <surface encounters macomb mi

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters rock tops surface encounters rock tops

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters rock tops surface encounters rock tops

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters mi surface encounters mi

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters mi surface encounters mi

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters quality marbl... surface encounters quality marbl...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters quality marbl...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser
surface encounters quality marbl... surface encounters.

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Netflix is using price hikes to manage the transition of users away from the physical product and towards digital streaming. While there are some similarities between that and the newspaper business, publishers shouldn't ...

Can <b>news</b> publishers learn anything from Netflix? — Tech <b>News</b> and <b>...</b>

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Are those who post unverified reports on Twitter playing an important role in the new ecosystem of news, or being irresponsible and indulging in gossip? That question goes to the heart of the idea of news as a process ...

Retweeting rumors and the reality of <b>news</b> as a process — Tech <b>News</b> <b>...</b>

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Before joining Bloomberg, Gaughan spent 12 years at Fox news Channel, serving in a number of roles including director of domestic news. It was at FNC where Gaughan first worked with David Rhodes, who was at the time the ...

Tim Gaughan Leaving Bloomberg for CBS <b>News</b> - TVNewser

Friday, July 22, 2011

Warning About On-line Payday Loans For Visitors

Have you attempted applying to get a online payday loansat a financial institution and had no collateral, assets or great credit score? In the event you said sure you most likely remember the sting of rejection that came from not getting the type of lending contract which you needed. Borrowing an quantity of money, of any size, is tougher now than it was just two many years in the past and for people who require extra cash to spend for unexpected bills, health-related expenses or personal needs obtaining a Payday Loan is the very best choice.

Payday Loans QuickPaydayLending.com  by carl2norberg


How you can Apply For Payday Loans

If you want to use for a United kingdom Payday Mortgage or payday lending anyplace else in the world you'll be requested to present the next items. 1. Proof of earnings - At least 6 months of consistent employment. two. Proof of age - You need to be 18 years aged or older. three. Proof of bank account - This really is required because you must write a examine to be offered the mortgage.

The typical payday contract charges a high APR (Annual Proportion Rate) that will range from .00 to .00 depending on just how much money you borrow. The APR that payday lending businesses charge has gotten a lot of flak recently and also the negative feedback is not always based on honesty. The substantial APR that payday lending businesses cost is high because the phrase of the loan is brief (generally 2-4 weeks). The APR is also higher than on other lending contracts due to the convenience with the brief term loan.

How you can Conserve Cash On Payday Loans

You are able to conserve money on online payday loansby selecting a local Payday Mortgage Loan company more than an online loan company. But in the event you reside in a state exactly where borrowing in opposition to your paycheck is outlawed you have to choose an online business. When you have your Payday Money Loan authorized, arranged priority to pay the mortgage off within 30 days because the longer you drag out the contract, the much more money you'll spend in finance costs to the loan company.

Track record Examine Sources Simple And Price Efficient

An employment background check is now usually done not only to potential employees but to present employees for promotion also. It's usually carried out to validate info found on an employee's resume or application form. It is also done to determine the very best suited potential employee amongst the candidates. Also with what has occurred on September 11, 2011, employers are actually extremely concerned using the kind of employees they hire.

A background investigation includes criminal, arrest, imprisonment, and intercourse offender paperwork. This is really a kind of examine where state records are examined to investigate if a possible worker or present worker has been convicted or charged with any crime in opposition to the state.

Citizenship, immigration and legal operating standing checks will also be carried out because American companies are barred from hiring illegal workers from the Division of Homeland Safety and its Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Division.

Background Check by bawler86


Litigation data are also checked. Employees who often file discrimination instances might be identified as being a danger to a company thus employers resort to litigation checks. Also, these businesses who do business using the authorities do not want to hire whistleblowers who file qui tam fits.

Driving and vehicle data are also part with the background check, particularly whenever a possible employee is applying to get a driver position. Employers look for employees who have clean driving records or those who don't have any records of vehicular accidents or traffic tickets.

Drug test records are also becoming checked. An employer wouldn't want to utilize drug addicts in his business due to corporate ethics, worker performance will be impacted and improve of workers' compensation rates.

Education data are also part of the criminal search investigation. This really is done to confirm academic attainment of the possible employee and sometimes to examine if applicant has had misdemeanor data in class.

Prior employment records might also be checked particularly if the applicant will fill a sensitive position within the business. This is usually done verbally.

Financial info is also checked particularly if the place becoming crammed demands someone to handle huge quantity of cash.

For professionals, licensing records are checked for complaints, disciplinary actions and investigations.

Health-related, mental and physiological files will also be checked because a potential employee might not be match to function for health reasons. A written consent in the applicant must be procured prior to heading via the whole process.

Social security quantity check is also carried out because identity theft is quite rampant. A previous life might be concealed or an applicant might not have fulfilled the citizenship requirement may be verified via the social security number.

Although most the over records are public data and may be procured from different government companies within the Usa of The united states, it's still extremely inconvenient for employers to do track record check on its possible workers and even current workers. You will find a number of private investigators who offer the service. Also, there are 3rd celebration providers who also provide the same type of support. You will find also available on-line information financial institutions which may provide the necessary information about people. What they do is they buy U.S. public records and provide them on-line to get a fee.

Essential Things To think about Before Purchasing Car Insurance coverage

Did you realize that exactly where you park your car at night results how much you're paying for automobile insurance coverage each and every month? Most insurers will not let you know this when they're signing you up for his or her coverage and this is why you're paying much more money for car insurance coverage compared to subsequent individual that you know.

How You are able to Save Cash On Auto insurance online

If you want to save money in your current automotive insurance strategy or discover inexpensive vehicle insurance you should think about applying one or all of the tips in this write-up for your insurance coverage policy. 1. Maintain a good credit score rating. 2. Usually inquire your insurer for discounts (example: good student low cost or good driver low cost). 3. Protect your car with an alarm or a safety gadget. four. Maintain your car in good condition. 5. Pay a higher deductible every year. These actions can all conserve you countless bucks per yr and simplify your life.

car insurance by advicecarinsurance


How Your Car Effects What you Pay Every Month

For many individuals if they've a quick, high profile automobile it's their baby plus they would never trading it in for something much more inexpensive and decrease profile but when you are on the budget and trying to save cash every month you should give promoting or trading inside your automobile some thought simply because selecting a different car may be the distinction among conserving or spending a few hundred or much more for each yr in car insurance.

One with the issues that you should by no means do is consider driving without insuring your automobile simply because the implications of driving without it are far greater than having to pay for an insurance coverage on your vehicle each and every month. Besides the serious monetary problems resulting from an incident including personal bankruptcy in the extremely least you could encounter tickets, fines, impounding of one's automobile or much more if you generate with out it. This is why it's always better to possess insurance in your car or begin walking more until you are able to manage it.


Thursday, July 21, 2011

Credit rating Range: Decides a Possible Borrowers

More and much more lenders, employers, landlords and insurance businesses are checking your FICO score as part of their procedure of approving your loan, landing a job, having your personal home to live, or good prices offered for any kind of insurance coverage which you may have utilized for. To attain all of those issues which you are dreaming of accomplishing developing a great free credit score background is the first factor which you have to do if in case you got one with a poor background.

Credit scores begin from the low 300 to the cream of the crop 850. A regular customer has a credit score assortment of 600 to 700 but some may have more than this. A FICO score will be the basis of most lenders and credit bureaus of computing your creditworthiness. A great credit score score falls on an average of 720 and over. Exactly where does one get the information on their respective credit score scores? By legislation this really is offered for free as soon as a yr coming from the 3 major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. Your scores and credit background exhibits your current and closed accounts as well as your payment background.

Lenders do generally take a look in your free credit score background because the basis on whether they will grant your loan at a good interest rate or deny this completely. If right now you're intrigued on applying to get a home loan that necessitates a substantial credit score score then it could be very best to use for FICO score monitoring which generally provides you an update on your scores on a weekly basis. Subscribing to this online service alerts you whenever you have reach your substantial score goal so long as you setup a threshold for it. Some would go as far as sending you an sms to alert you when your scores have alter for your better or for the worst.

Credit repair secrets to raise your credit score on credit score scale at https://www.720creditscore.com/ by bbrij873


To help you develop a much better credit score score and history listed here are some simple guidelines to follow:

Request a duplicate of one's credit history as needed if not wait for it once a yr but do keep track of your background for just about any mistakes. In the event you see discrepancies then you are able to dispute them by going through your reviews thoroughly.


Pay your bills promptly. Add some more on the minimal quantity that you usually spend because this would cause your credit score to rise and would be obvious for many loan companies that you are a good borrower because you pay promptly and is also sincere in settling your expenses.Steer clear of maxing out in your credit limit. This will certainly cause your credit scores to drop that fast. Cancel credit score cards that you aren't using or do not require and spend promptly for your credit card expenses.

Hoodia Gordonii Diet Capsules - Effective Fat Reducer


The way in which hoodia functions is fairly simple. Following consumption, the active molecule in Hoodia-P57-acts as a natural blood sugar stabilizer, which in flip prevents the insulin spike that triggers starvation. The outcome is definitely an extended feeling fullness, generally for up to six hrs following consuming, along with the elimination from the urge to snack in in between meals. That is why they're mentioned to be among the top diet drugs that operate.



What this suggests is folks who eat substantially much less on the every day foundation, regularly resulting in weight reduction. For example, inside a 2006 study conducted by Phytopharm pharmaceutical company-the major researcher of Hoodia diet plan supplements-obese subjects who consumed Hoodia ate a thousand energy much less on a daily basis, and 7000 calories less per week, than topics denied Hoodia.



Contemplating that it requires a deficit of 3000 calories to shed 1 pound of physique fat, this might very easily translate to a lack of two kilos per week, and a loss at least10 kilos monthly. For this reason, the weight reduction business is now harvesting and manufacturing Hoodia Gordonni as a diet supplement. Hoodia diet pills are readily accessible on the net and in health foods shops everywhere.




Hoodia gordonii - הודיה גורדוני by yoel_tw



Diet plan pills that deliver the results are very difficult to arrive by, particularly on the internet. So should you are not comfy with purchasing them on the internet, then we suggest browsing your native supplement retailer in city to find out if they have any of what you are seeking. Chain health foods stores like GNC, Wholefoods, and so on. are rather excellent about carrying diet plan supplements that work like hoodia gordonii.

Hemorrhoid Treatment - Knowing the very best Treatment

As there are all-natural treatments for any ailment, it is only obvious to believe that hemorrhoid treatment also includes the natural remedies in its list. There are other remedies for hemorrhoids, obviously, and they're the much more conventional techniques to assist remedy hemorrhoids. But heading all-natural is simply as great as the other hemorrhoid treatments. Little doubt that it demands a longer time for you to cure compared to standard methods, but it has proven to become effective in pain reduction and healing.

hemorrhoids.jpg by preyingmantis


The top natural remedy to be able to assist deal with hemorrhoids
would be good aged fiber. We all know the significant properties of fiber. It helps with our digestion, softens out stool, and increases its bulk. This would help decrease any straining on our bowel movement. Among the main causes of hemorrhoids is strained bowel action. With fiber in your program, there will be less strain as we do our bowel motion. This would clearly help in relieving hemorrhoid discomfort and bleeding.

With fiber as a extremely important factor in hemorrhoid therapy, it's crucial that we keep up a wholesome high-fiber diet. You will find plenty of fiber-rich food accessible to us --- vegetables, fruits, entire grains, etc. We also have to drink lots of water to assist with digestion and also the softening of our stool.

An additional all-natural treatment that ought to be present in our hemorrhoid treatment dietary supplements is the citrus bioflavonoids. Citrus bioflavonoids can be found in citrus fruits, and they've been discovered to be very helpful in decreasing symptoms of pain, bleeding, and itchiness. They're also helpful in reducing anal discomfort and anal discharge.

Butcher's broom is a plant which has long been in use to help cure hemorrhoids and varicose veins. There is no confirmation yet, but it has been stated that the extract from this plant has anti-flammatory and vein-constricting attributes that will assist to shrink swollen tissue and enhance the veins. Despite its substantial advantage over hemorrhoids, the butcher's broom is hazardous to individuals to hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and ladies who are pregnant or nursing. It should be noted which you possess a doctor's suggestion before seeking therapy using the butcher's broom. The butcher's broom is also known as knee holly, box holly, and sweet broom.

Another popular natural treatment included in hemorrhoid cure
dietary supplements is the herb horse chestnut. This herb can also be useful in enhancing blood circulation in the veins. It also reduces inflammation and irritation, and it assists strengthen blood vessel walls. We also have to be cautious with this plant. Some components of it are poisonous, and you will find said to become unwanted side effects in taking it. The side effects are unusual, and include kidney harm, bleeding, bruising, and damage towards the liver.

Other all-natural treatments for the therapy of hemorrhoids include bilberry extract and gotu kola extract. Each of this natural extracts assist within the safety and maintenance with the power and circulatory features with the hemorrhoid and varicose veins.

All these might not necessarily be integrated as ingredients in your dietary supplements or medication. Bear in mind that some of the all-natural treatments listed above can have side effects. In choosing this alternative method in hemorrhoid therapy, we ought to always consult with our doctors initial.


A Nearer Appear at Therapy and Leads to of Genital Warts

Warts are tiny, benign outgrowths or fleshy bumps jutting out through the skin surface. Warts are mainly brought on by HPV or human papillomavirus infection that impacts the epidermis and spreads through person to individual get in touch with. Thus warts are contagious. Warts may happen on back again of fingers, toes, knees, bottom of foot, legs, encounter, knees, around the nail etc. Warts may occur in clusters or may be in the type of single, lengthy stalks. treatment for genital warts are probably the most troublesome and might turn cancerous in the event the HPV virus infects the mucosal tissue lining the genital area.

The annoying flesh-colored genital warts relief spread through sexual contact. Each males and ladies can agreement genital warts, and HPV-6 and HPV-11 are particularly responsible for it. It is typical among age teams 17-33. In children also it may develop, but in their situation it spreads via immediate, manual get in touch with. Unprotected intercourse, numerous sexual partners, and intake of contraceptive tablets are accountable for your spreading of genital warts.

The genital warts might be less than one mm in size, and may extend in diameter up to one cm. often two or much more warts may be part of to type a lump like structure. Warts are painless, itchy and frequently give out discharge. They hardly ever bleed and might also trigger urinary obstruction if the warts grow around the urethral exit. In men, it occur in urethral area, rectal area, scrotum and penis or penile shaft. In women, genital warts occur in labia minora, cervix, vaginal canal and vaginal opening.

Genital warts can be fairly annoying and embarrassing. Marketplace provides hoards of anti-wart medications for genital warts. But whilst choosing genital wart eradicating drug, 1 ought to be careful, for they are to handle a very delicate region with the physique. It's therefore better to go for goods with natural formulations than for poisonous, synthetic medication. Herbal products are safe, secure, inexpensive and totally free from adverse side-effects.

genital_warts - 42 by PLGSTD05


Wartrol is 1 this kind of all-natural wart relief. But 1 ought to keep in mind that no long term cure for genital warts has yet been found. Watrol can give you momentary reduction from itching, irritation and burning sensation brought on because of warts. Additionally, it lowers the number of long term occurrences or outbreaks. Wartrol will be the best non-prescription instant relief from warts. For quick relief, 1 can straight spray Watrol on the site of out-break or consider it orally by spraying it beneath the tongue thrice a day. Similar to this the components would be readily absorbed through the tiny corpuscles and reach the interiors of the body. 1 ought to not touch the dropper or top of bottle with fingers, and should be cautious concerning staying away from contamination. Prior to spraying in to mouth, one ought to clean mouth thoroughly. The product is an incredible immediate answer for warts.

The ingredients within the product include Black Sulphide of Antimony, wild yellow indigo baptisia, Potassium Hydrate Causticum, nitric acid, arbor vitae, alcohol and distilled water. These ingredients reduce wart dimension, caustic feeling, rawness, bleeding and additional eruptions, and produces magical results within brief time span. Whenever, you're attempting to deal with infection problem with all-natural treatments, you are at secure side. Natural remedies or natural remedies do not have any side effects and operates successfully. Within this item all the components are all-natural and herbal, so you can effortlessly trust on this and use to deal with your warts issue through the root.

You'll discover improvement in extremely brief time following using this item on normal foundation. Natural treatments might take a while to show the results, however the results are permanent and lengthy lasting. Therefore, using this product to remedy genital warts is secure and effective.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

3874351

After you think about marketing your business on golf courses, there are different items to be deemed just before buying indicators. The primary purpose is good quality from the signs. Ensure that the indicators that display your brand are created employing supplies that could withstand the toughest of environments and do not involve much upkeep.

Go for a wide selection of supplies - aluminum, bronze, granite, redwood, sandstone Kingstone or Rinowood to search out the sign that suits for your business requirement. You will find some respected firms that offer fantastic turnaround time that would make certain your satisfaction from their service. A reliable firm that delivers excellent service is Bench Craft Company. You may contact such an advertising firm straight and get a quote. You wish your signs to look desirable and sophisticated.

Golf cart is yet another efficient way of reaching golfers. You'll have your advertisements in direct sight in the golfers when they ride the cart. An common round of golf lasts for 5 hrs, which means plenty of time to acquire sufficient impression. Billboards are the key advertising items on golf courses. It has double sides, which helps in displaying advertisements on the two sides. It could be set up amid the assistance poles on the front or rear side in the cart. The perfect size for billboards is 4x36 inches and, it might vary based on the course. And, you may remain assured that it may deliver you 300 to 400 impressions inside a round.

A pin seeker banner is an additional efficient way of branding on the golf course. Together with the important information regarding the course, you'll be able to also show your brand or logo on pin seeker banners. This can be installed amid the support poles on the front and rear side in the golf cart. They also have an ideal size of 4x36 inches, which can retain varying based on the course. Similar towards the billboards, they're able to also help your messages receive as a lot of as 300 impressions inside a round.

The GPS around the golf cart can also be utilised as being a wonderful marketing medium. The critical distance information is always checked by golfers, and you can get your ads displayed beside the display. The GPS units are mainly installed around the dashboard or around the windshield. And, the advantage of marketing on digital technologies is the fact that you may update your advertisements whenever you wish.
Marketing firms like Bench Craft Company provide complete sponsorship and advertising possibilities that enable your brand to achieve matchless exposure towards the high-end golf players and audience. Employing the considerable advertising possibilities, you can get your brand messages displayed on golf courses for prolonged periods of time.

The benefit of advertising on golf courses is the fact that it provides you more than 90% attain to golfers and audience, and there is certainly no other medium that offers so much achievement rate. Considering that your brand gets an extended period of exposure, golfers will be in a position to view your advertisements from 1 to six hrs on the basis from the placement. And, this signifies that you receive constructive recognition for the brand as golfers will link it with enjoyment. And, after you are functioning with specialist advertising firms, you'll be able to stay assured that there may be no cluttering as every single placement will carry separate brands.
Another powerful advertising medium is the golfer’s bag. Golfers drive around the course with their bags or they just leave it in the bag drop, nevertheless it can generally get a minimum of 30 impressions inside of a round.

Another marketing medium to reach a wide spectrum of golfers is through driving ranges. The common session can final from 30 to 45 minutes, and you can get unique impressions to your brands and items.

Driving assortment displays help you reach golfers of distinct ranges. You get top logo positioning in unique hitting bay. Advertising firms styles driving ranges, customized to suit the present variety configuration of every course. This contains pop-out banners, A-frames and materials for mesh banner.

Qualified advertising firms ensure complete flexibility so as to generate confident that your business gets linked with your audience inside a manner it makes sense.

Nearly all of the trustworthy golf course advertising firms let you decide on inventory on the golf course or for golf occasions. And, since the campaigns may be customized, they may often fit into for your price range. The length of one's advertising campaign can assortment above golf seasons or above months.

And, each of the characteristics from the campaign are facilitated by the marketing firm. This contains layout, placement, reporting and upkeep. And, the approval from the golf course, for the creative materials, can also be the responsibility with the advertising firm. In case you are considering exploring golf course marketing to promote your small business, you then need to undoubtedly look into http://benchcraftcompany.net

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Making Money System

I've been traveling a lot in recent weeks and had the pleasure of meeting policymakers in a number of countries. Perhaps the most interesting of those meetings occurred in a small workshop attended by a couple of policymakers who had worked with Timothy Geithner to bail-out Wall Street. Let me just say that these were intelligent guys with their hearts in the right places. While they probably did not think they were doing “God's work” (as the Vampire Blood Sucking Squid put it), they certainly did think they were operating in the public interest.


They shared a view that what we experienced back in 2008 was the mother of all liquidity crises. As one of them put it, the crisis boiled down to this: the world missed a payment, then all hell broke loose. To summarize this view, we had a highly leveraged and interdependent financial system that relied on extremely short-term borrowing (overnight) to finance positions in assets.


A key link in the liquidity chain was the money market mutual fund, which essentially promised close substitutes for bank deposits, but without the government guarantee. MMMFs purchased very short term debt issued by the shadow banking system (held as assets). When it looked like forces would “break the buck” there was a massive run on the money markets which made it impossible for the MMMF's to continue to provide overnight funding to the shadow banks. This is a $3 trillion uninsured “deposit-like” market that the government had to guarantee dollar-for dollar. All told, the bailout of Wall Street amounted to more than $29 trillion (that is the “flow” number; the outstanding stock maxed at perhaps $8 trillion—still a very big number). That is what happens when the world “misses a payment”.


While this is not the topic for this blog, just think about the possibilities if $8 trillion (leaving to the side $29 trillion) had been devoted to bailing out Main Street rather than Wall Street. We'd be fully employed, driving brand new SUVs, and making payments on our overpriced MacMansions. All that is too obvious to require any explication. Now, I think these guys are wrong. Dangerously so. What we actually had (and have) were massively insolvent Wall Street shadow banks, so their short term liabilities were trash. The run on MMMFs was not an irrational liquidity run, but rather a rational run on institutions that were holding garbage as assets. The federal government made that garbage as sweet smelling as roses, by intervening in the biggest bailout in human history, by several orders of magnitude. And it did not have to be that way.


Let us instead deal with a “what if”. Suppose we had decided not to bailout the MMMFs and let the insolvent shadow banks go down. What if we had not handed bank charters to Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (the last two investment banks standing)? What if we had simply closed down what my colleague Bill Black calls “systemically dangerous institutions”? What if we had let the market “work”—in its wisdom it wanted to close down the biggest financial institutions and to rid the world of shadow banking. What if we had let that happen?


We know the view at the Treasury: from Rubin to Paulson to Geithner the view is that we'd have no economy at all. Forget about a financial system—we'd be back to bartering coconuts for fish. That was the claim made by Paulson when he went to Congress and demanded nearly a trillion dollars to bailout his Wall Street buds, with a gun to his head and threatening to pull the trigger. What if we had borrowed a line from Clint Eastwood: “go ahead, make my day”? Blow your own stupid head off.


Here's a hypothesis. We'd be MUCH better off today. The banksters would all be gone—retired to their offshore islands with whatever riches they had been able to hide away. We'd still have, oh, about 4000 banks, mostly honest, mostly making loans to firms and households, and with reasonable compensation and no special power over Washington. This ain't just my hypothesis. In a very interesting (and to my mind, convincing) article, Robert G. Wilmers, chairman and chief executive officer of M&T Bank Corp. (MTB) made the case for me. Indeed, his piece is so good that I cannot possibly improve upon it. Let me provide a few key (and somewhat long) excerpts. The whole piece is here: Small Banks, Big Banks, Giant Differences: Robert G. Wilmers


First, Mr. Wilmers rightly notes the long term transformation of banking away from lending and to trading:


Community banks have given way to big banks and excessive industry concentration; profits are increasingly driven by risky trading; leverage is taking precedence over prudent lending; compensation is out of control. This toxic combination leads to continued taxpayer risk and threatens long-term U.S. prosperity. To understand the change, first consider history. Banking once was a community-based enterprise, relying on local knowledge to guide the process of gathering customer deposits and extending credit. Done well, this arrangement ensures that deposits are deployed into a diversified pool of investments, while providing depositors with liquidity and a return on their savings. Over the past generation, however, the financial services industry changed dramatically. In 1990, the six largest financial institutions accounted for 9 percent of all U.S. domestic deposits. As of Dec. 31, 2010, the six biggest banks accounted for 36 percent of deposits.

Amazing analysis, from a banker. The big banks have virtually no interest in lending. They use deposits to finance their trading activity; and when the trades go bad they ask Uncle Sam to bail them out.


Such concentration raises the concern that poor decisions at such outsized institutions can lead to systemic risk. But this risk is greatly magnified by the new way in which the major banks, those deemed too big to fail, are doing business today. The largest and most profitable bank holding companies have moved away from traditional lending and come to rely on speculative trading in all types of securities, derivatives, credit default swaps, mortgage-backed securities and other, even more complex and exotic financial instruments -- many of them associated with high leverage. Such trading now is the engine of income. In 2010, the six largest bank holding companies generated $56.1 billion in trading revenue, or 74 percent of their $75.7 billion in pretax income. Trading revenue at these institutions distinguishes them from traditional commercial banks, which aren't typically involved in such speculative endeavors. The Big Six institutions earned more than 93 percent of the trading revenue generated by all American banks during the past two years. To say these large institutions are the same species as traditional commercial banks is akin to describing dinosaurs as reptiles -- true but profoundly misleading.

In reality these institutions are what my colleague Bill Black calls control frauds. Their sole purpose is to enrich top management with outsized bonuses. Trading is the preferred activity. First because they can screw the suckers. But more importantly, because trading profits can be whatever you want them to be. You buy my trash at outlandish prices, and I buy your trash at ridiculous prices. We book profits and pay ourselves bonuses. So long as regulators look the other way, there is quite simply no limit to how much we “earn”. Just ask Hank and Bob—whose rich rewards were due to trading activity.


Consider that in 1929 compensation for employees in the financial-services industry was just 1.5 times that of the average nonfarm U.S. worker. By 2009 employees in the securities and investments sector, which includes investment banks, securities brokerages and commodities dealers, earned 3.4 times as much as an average U.S. worker. The average 2009 investment banking compensation at four of the top banks was at least six times that of an average American worker -- while employees in the traditional commercial bank sector earned just 1.2 times the average nonfarm employee. The chief executive officers at the top six bank holding companies were paid an average of $26 million in 2007, or 516 times the U.S. median household income. Indeed, those bank CEOs are paid 2.3 times the average total CEO compensation of the top Fortune 50 nonbank companies.

The bailout of Wall Street was, by design, an effort to keep those bonuses flowing. Oh, who designed it? Well, Hank, Bob and future Goldman Sachs employee Timothy. And who guaranteed the bonuses? Uncle Sam. What is the consequence? Destruction of the real banks—those that still make loans.



The major Wall Street banks operate under the taxpayer-backed umbrella of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and, as we saw in 2008, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve. To pay for the cost of such protection, legislators and regulators have forced thousands of Main Street banks like the one I run to absorb a larger, more expensive set of regulatory costs, including higher capital and liquidity requirements. This threatens to deny small-business owners, entrepreneurs and innovators the credit they need and on which the economy relies.


Such, I fear, are the bitter fruits of a financial services industry unmoored from its traditional role in the commercial economy and a regulatory regime that protects outsized compensation tied to trading. Regulators have failed to distinguish between trading activity and traditional banking, or to recognize that the activity of an institution, not its form, should be the proper focus of oversight.



We know what happened to “reform”—it got captured by Dodd-Frank, legislation overseen by two of the most conflicted legislators the US has ever seen. Worse, President Obama has in recent days renewed his love affair with Wall Street, returning with open arms to rebuild bridges. After all, he wants at least $1 billion to conduct his next campaign. All that drives home the fact that true reform is impossible so long as these “too big to fail”, systemically dangerous institutions are kept on Washington's life support.


Wilmers offers an unassailable agenda for policy makers:


Main Street banks are heavily regulated -- and have been for generations -- to ensure their safety, soundness and transparency. A new generation of regulation must now be applied to what has become a virtual casino. All the players must be included -- Wall Street banks, investment banks and hedge funds. Complex derivatives and credit default swaps must be brought out of the shadows and into public clearinghouses, so that markets can know their magnitude and extent. Those financial institutions that engage in trading should live and die by the pursuit of their fortunes, rather than impose a burden on the whole economy. It's time to disentangle the trading of big financial institutions from their more traditional commercial banking operations and put an end to this unsafe business model.

Unfortunately, I am not optimistic. First we will need another global financial collapse—probably one bigger than what we experienced in 2008—to make this policy politically feasible. Second, we must close all the big, systemically dangerous institutions. They control policy-making and they have an unfair advantage over community banks. The subsidy offered to Goldman alone (in the form of insured deposits plus an obvious backstop that will prevent Goldman from failing no matter how bad its trades go) is worth tens of billions of dollars. Community banks cannot compete with that. There is no hope so long as Goldman et al remain in business.


Sometimes the best answer is “TINA”: there is no alternative. To shutting down the biggest banks. The next crisis—which could come any day now—will offer that opportunity. It would be foolish to waste another crisis.


 


L. Randall Wray is a Professor of Economics, University of Missouri—Kansas City. A student of Hyman Minsky, his research focuses on monetary and fiscal policy as well as unemployment and job creation. He writes a weekly column for Benzinga every Tuesday. He also blogs at New Economic Perspectives, and is a BrainTruster at New Deal 2.0. He is a senior scholar at the Levy Economics Institute, and has been a visiting professor at the University of Rome (La Sapienza), UNAM (Mexico City), University of Paris (South), and the University of Bologna (Italy).


From Peter Tchir of TF Market Advisors

The Countdown to Sovereign Debt Write-offs Has Started

Don’t be fooled by the IMF’s announcement that Greece will get a new round of money.  This bailout is merely to give a couple of months for the parties to seriously negotiate what haircuts and debt extensions investors need to take in Greece, and Ireland and Portugal.  Virtually all the comments made by the parties involved fit in with the view that we are now in a phase where people are negotiating how much they will write off and what else they will do.  Almost none of the comments indicate that anyone is really trying to put together a plan that is going kick the can down the road for a long time.  I am fading this rally as only the most optimistic investor can believe that this problem doesn’t lead to real default/restructuring with haircuts in the next couple of months.

Why do banks waive covenants?

It looks like Greece has failed to meet the criteria the IMF had set out to provide more money, yet the IMF seems intent on releasing the next tranche.  Banks typically waive covenants and release more money only when they truly believe the borrower will turn around, or when they extract enough value from the borrower that they feel safe making the new loan, or when they aren’t prepared to deal forcing the borrower into default. 

Does anyone really believe that Greece is going to get turned around?  I don’t.  In fact I am highly confident that Greece will still not meet the criteria the IMF has set out when it is time for the next tranche.  That will be the deadline for the default/restructuring.  The IMF can waive the covenants this time because shortly they get to review the progress again and can fail them at that time.

The IMF, which allegedly has some collateral for the loans it is making, be receiving even more collateral on this latest tranche?  Could they have perfected their security interests making their own loans extremely safe?  That is a real possibility.  If this next tranche only includes IMF money, or lending that is collateralized very specifically it would be another clear sign that the game has changed and the lenders are protecting their new loans at expense of existing bondholders.

Are the IMF, or the EU, or the ECB, or the banks prepared to deal with a default or real restructuring right now?  The answer clearly seems to be no, but it is also clear that over the past month, the EU in particular has realized restructuring, possibly with losses needs to occur.  Talk about the ‘Vienna accord’ and ‘voluntary private restructuring’ has become louder.  That will take time.  How do you easily pressure a bank into taking a loss, particularly while were still hopeful for a painless solution just a few weeks ago.  These ‘voluntary’ decisions won’t be so voluntary, but it will take time for the governments to convince their banks en masse to reach an agreement.

Waiving the covenants and providing the next tranche of IMF money, particularly if fully secured, is completely consistent with the idea that we have entered a relatively short period of negotiations leading to real restructuring.

Germany is laying the groundwork for real write-offs.

Germany was the first EU member to suggest private sector haircuts.  It has seemed more open to private sector losses than any other
government.  Not only has the German Finance Minister been outspoken on his desire to include the private sector in any package, but the Bundesbank issued a statement that it is confident that the Euro can withstand Greek default.  That was the first time in this crisis that a statement has come out trying to prepare the markets for a potential default.  As statement start to come out stating that the banking system is strong enough to withstand a default, you know someone is seriously considering a default.  I believe that this statement, which has been largely ignored, is a tell.  It is the first step in the process of trying to soften the market.

Against this, the ECB continues to lash out that restructuring/default is not an option.  At least that is how it seems on the surface.  A little below the surface and it seems like they are starting to take some steps to soften their stance.  First, and most importantly, Draghi seems to be the main spokesman.  Trichet seems to be quiet on the subject now.  Many people (at least me) blame Trichet for making the situation worse through the ECB’s wanton purchase of Greek (and Irish and Portuguese) bonds in the open market.  By bringing Draghi to the front line are they starting to distance themselves from ECB policy under Trichet?  Are they setting him up as a scapegoat?  It is plausible to me.  Then even looking more closely at what Draghi says also indicates a potential softening.  He says “The cost of a real default…”   What does he mean by real?  Is that to make it easier to wiggle out down the road and say whatever happens wasn’t a “real” default?

Germany seems to be moving further into private losses and preparing the markets for how contained those losses will be and the ECB is softening a bit and making it easier to blame its original stance on Trichet if they change their mind.

What about contagion risk?

There is real risk of contagion.  That is another reason that the EU/IMF/ECB need to buy a few more months because not only do they have to restructure Ireland and Portugal.  When the next plan is announced it will be comprehensive and Greece, Ireland, and Portugal will be included.  I had been surprised how quiet Ireland has been.  Other than being mentioned in general terms as part of a contagion argument, relatively few new specifics were being talked about.  Suddenly this week, here they are.  Allied Irish sub debt had a credit Event.  Noonan is speaking about haircuts for senior Allied Irish bondholders.  He is commenting on Greece.  It is not a coincidence in my mind that suddenly he is speaking out, as he is likely involved in this next phase of negotiations.  In fact, it seems that the number of finance ministers and ECB officials who are hitting the airwaves is expanding.  I assume if that many people feel the need to comment, something serious is going on behind the scenes.

Contagion risk is there, but it is being addressed so Greece, Ireland and Portugal can be sorted out at once, and the banks that would be in biggest trouble can get help if they need it.

The Government Changes in Greece Point to Default

You could argue that the changes to the Greek parliament are an attempt to get approval to jam another round of austerity on its people.  That could be, but I think it is more likely that Prime Minister Papandreou does not want to be labeled as the man who put Greece in default or who crushed the Euro, so he is trying to escape that role, or drag others into a group to share the blame.  He is clearly politically savvy, he was an MD at Goldman, and prime minister.  If I was him I would be trying to do things so that my name doesn’t go down in history as the person who broke the Euro.

Banks Can’t Handle the Defaults

I really think most banks can handle the defaults.  The most likely outcome, in my opinion, is there is some amount of permanent debt reduction and any remaining debt has its maturity extended for a long time.  The banks that aren’t mark to market would have to take a loss on any permanent reduction in principal but there is no reason they have to take a loss on any debt that they extend the maturity.  So if a bank took 100 million of 2 year bonds, and exchanged them for 80 million of 10 year bonds, they would take a write off of 20 million.  That seems manageable for most banks (and the governments can directly support any bank that can’t handle it).  From a stock price perspective, no one is buying the stocks of banks with big exposure to Greece, Ireland, and Portugal, on the basis that they don’t have impairments in the portfolio.  Given where debt is currently trading, and how much of the write off is permanent, and the trading price of new bonds, bank stocks may rally.  I occasionally read articles about banks trading below book value as being cheap.  I usually stop there because I believe smart investors try to figure out the value of the banks holdings are not easily fooled by non mark to market accounting.  If I am correct, the banks will have some big losses, their share prices may not react much, and the various EU countries can bailout their own banks directly if they choose to.

CDS?

A subject that will get its own write-up,  but from the data available from the DTCC, concerns about CDS on sovereigns seems overblown, even if there is a Credit Event.  Of all the subjects written about, the only that seems to get the least accurate treatment is the potential impact of CDS on the outcome.  The problem is a debt problem.  The bulk of all losses will result from poor lending and bond buying decisions.  CDS will spread some gains and losses around, but will not in itself have a meaningful impact on the market.  Trying to compare AIG is wrong as AIG had almost nothing to do with single name CDS and had ridiculously loose collateral terms even by the 2007 standards, let alone today. Lehman, with massive amounts of debt saw its CDS settle with little confusion, and the market dealt pretty well with the loss of Lehman as counterparty on so many CDS trades.  There were more surprising losses from things as simple as repo agreements than from its role as CDS market maker. 




<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

Among the many shocking facts that have emerged from the News of the World hacking crisis, it is the revelations about News International's dysfunctional leadership and the NoW's brutal organizational culture that have ...

<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

The company's stock price has dropped since the revelations of a wider phone hacking scandal at News of the World.

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

We already know that the News of the World hacked the phones of virtually everyone in England, including dead people and the prime minister and, probably, you. But with the latest revelation, the scandal has actually ...

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

providence bobby ferguson

<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

Among the many shocking facts that have emerged from the News of the World hacking crisis, it is the revelations about News International's dysfunctional leadership and the NoW's brutal organizational culture that have ...

<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

The company's stock price has dropped since the revelations of a wider phone hacking scandal at News of the World.

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

We already know that the News of the World hacked the phones of virtually everyone in England, including dead people and the prime minister and, probably, you. But with the latest revelation, the scandal has actually ...

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

I've been traveling a lot in recent weeks and had the pleasure of meeting policymakers in a number of countries. Perhaps the most interesting of those meetings occurred in a small workshop attended by a couple of policymakers who had worked with Timothy Geithner to bail-out Wall Street. Let me just say that these were intelligent guys with their hearts in the right places. While they probably did not think they were doing “God's work” (as the Vampire Blood Sucking Squid put it), they certainly did think they were operating in the public interest.


They shared a view that what we experienced back in 2008 was the mother of all liquidity crises. As one of them put it, the crisis boiled down to this: the world missed a payment, then all hell broke loose. To summarize this view, we had a highly leveraged and interdependent financial system that relied on extremely short-term borrowing (overnight) to finance positions in assets.


A key link in the liquidity chain was the money market mutual fund, which essentially promised close substitutes for bank deposits, but without the government guarantee. MMMFs purchased very short term debt issued by the shadow banking system (held as assets). When it looked like forces would “break the buck” there was a massive run on the money markets which made it impossible for the MMMF's to continue to provide overnight funding to the shadow banks. This is a $3 trillion uninsured “deposit-like” market that the government had to guarantee dollar-for dollar. All told, the bailout of Wall Street amounted to more than $29 trillion (that is the “flow” number; the outstanding stock maxed at perhaps $8 trillion—still a very big number). That is what happens when the world “misses a payment”.


While this is not the topic for this blog, just think about the possibilities if $8 trillion (leaving to the side $29 trillion) had been devoted to bailing out Main Street rather than Wall Street. We'd be fully employed, driving brand new SUVs, and making payments on our overpriced MacMansions. All that is too obvious to require any explication. Now, I think these guys are wrong. Dangerously so. What we actually had (and have) were massively insolvent Wall Street shadow banks, so their short term liabilities were trash. The run on MMMFs was not an irrational liquidity run, but rather a rational run on institutions that were holding garbage as assets. The federal government made that garbage as sweet smelling as roses, by intervening in the biggest bailout in human history, by several orders of magnitude. And it did not have to be that way.


Let us instead deal with a “what if”. Suppose we had decided not to bailout the MMMFs and let the insolvent shadow banks go down. What if we had not handed bank charters to Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (the last two investment banks standing)? What if we had simply closed down what my colleague Bill Black calls “systemically dangerous institutions”? What if we had let the market “work”—in its wisdom it wanted to close down the biggest financial institutions and to rid the world of shadow banking. What if we had let that happen?


We know the view at the Treasury: from Rubin to Paulson to Geithner the view is that we'd have no economy at all. Forget about a financial system—we'd be back to bartering coconuts for fish. That was the claim made by Paulson when he went to Congress and demanded nearly a trillion dollars to bailout his Wall Street buds, with a gun to his head and threatening to pull the trigger. What if we had borrowed a line from Clint Eastwood: “go ahead, make my day”? Blow your own stupid head off.


Here's a hypothesis. We'd be MUCH better off today. The banksters would all be gone—retired to their offshore islands with whatever riches they had been able to hide away. We'd still have, oh, about 4000 banks, mostly honest, mostly making loans to firms and households, and with reasonable compensation and no special power over Washington. This ain't just my hypothesis. In a very interesting (and to my mind, convincing) article, Robert G. Wilmers, chairman and chief executive officer of M&T Bank Corp. (MTB) made the case for me. Indeed, his piece is so good that I cannot possibly improve upon it. Let me provide a few key (and somewhat long) excerpts. The whole piece is here: Small Banks, Big Banks, Giant Differences: Robert G. Wilmers


First, Mr. Wilmers rightly notes the long term transformation of banking away from lending and to trading:


Community banks have given way to big banks and excessive industry concentration; profits are increasingly driven by risky trading; leverage is taking precedence over prudent lending; compensation is out of control. This toxic combination leads to continued taxpayer risk and threatens long-term U.S. prosperity. To understand the change, first consider history. Banking once was a community-based enterprise, relying on local knowledge to guide the process of gathering customer deposits and extending credit. Done well, this arrangement ensures that deposits are deployed into a diversified pool of investments, while providing depositors with liquidity and a return on their savings. Over the past generation, however, the financial services industry changed dramatically. In 1990, the six largest financial institutions accounted for 9 percent of all U.S. domestic deposits. As of Dec. 31, 2010, the six biggest banks accounted for 36 percent of deposits.

Amazing analysis, from a banker. The big banks have virtually no interest in lending. They use deposits to finance their trading activity; and when the trades go bad they ask Uncle Sam to bail them out.


Such concentration raises the concern that poor decisions at such outsized institutions can lead to systemic risk. But this risk is greatly magnified by the new way in which the major banks, those deemed too big to fail, are doing business today. The largest and most profitable bank holding companies have moved away from traditional lending and come to rely on speculative trading in all types of securities, derivatives, credit default swaps, mortgage-backed securities and other, even more complex and exotic financial instruments -- many of them associated with high leverage. Such trading now is the engine of income. In 2010, the six largest bank holding companies generated $56.1 billion in trading revenue, or 74 percent of their $75.7 billion in pretax income. Trading revenue at these institutions distinguishes them from traditional commercial banks, which aren't typically involved in such speculative endeavors. The Big Six institutions earned more than 93 percent of the trading revenue generated by all American banks during the past two years. To say these large institutions are the same species as traditional commercial banks is akin to describing dinosaurs as reptiles -- true but profoundly misleading.

In reality these institutions are what my colleague Bill Black calls control frauds. Their sole purpose is to enrich top management with outsized bonuses. Trading is the preferred activity. First because they can screw the suckers. But more importantly, because trading profits can be whatever you want them to be. You buy my trash at outlandish prices, and I buy your trash at ridiculous prices. We book profits and pay ourselves bonuses. So long as regulators look the other way, there is quite simply no limit to how much we “earn”. Just ask Hank and Bob—whose rich rewards were due to trading activity.


Consider that in 1929 compensation for employees in the financial-services industry was just 1.5 times that of the average nonfarm U.S. worker. By 2009 employees in the securities and investments sector, which includes investment banks, securities brokerages and commodities dealers, earned 3.4 times as much as an average U.S. worker. The average 2009 investment banking compensation at four of the top banks was at least six times that of an average American worker -- while employees in the traditional commercial bank sector earned just 1.2 times the average nonfarm employee. The chief executive officers at the top six bank holding companies were paid an average of $26 million in 2007, or 516 times the U.S. median household income. Indeed, those bank CEOs are paid 2.3 times the average total CEO compensation of the top Fortune 50 nonbank companies.

The bailout of Wall Street was, by design, an effort to keep those bonuses flowing. Oh, who designed it? Well, Hank, Bob and future Goldman Sachs employee Timothy. And who guaranteed the bonuses? Uncle Sam. What is the consequence? Destruction of the real banks—those that still make loans.



The major Wall Street banks operate under the taxpayer-backed umbrella of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and, as we saw in 2008, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve. To pay for the cost of such protection, legislators and regulators have forced thousands of Main Street banks like the one I run to absorb a larger, more expensive set of regulatory costs, including higher capital and liquidity requirements. This threatens to deny small-business owners, entrepreneurs and innovators the credit they need and on which the economy relies.


Such, I fear, are the bitter fruits of a financial services industry unmoored from its traditional role in the commercial economy and a regulatory regime that protects outsized compensation tied to trading. Regulators have failed to distinguish between trading activity and traditional banking, or to recognize that the activity of an institution, not its form, should be the proper focus of oversight.



We know what happened to “reform”—it got captured by Dodd-Frank, legislation overseen by two of the most conflicted legislators the US has ever seen. Worse, President Obama has in recent days renewed his love affair with Wall Street, returning with open arms to rebuild bridges. After all, he wants at least $1 billion to conduct his next campaign. All that drives home the fact that true reform is impossible so long as these “too big to fail”, systemically dangerous institutions are kept on Washington's life support.


Wilmers offers an unassailable agenda for policy makers:


Main Street banks are heavily regulated -- and have been for generations -- to ensure their safety, soundness and transparency. A new generation of regulation must now be applied to what has become a virtual casino. All the players must be included -- Wall Street banks, investment banks and hedge funds. Complex derivatives and credit default swaps must be brought out of the shadows and into public clearinghouses, so that markets can know their magnitude and extent. Those financial institutions that engage in trading should live and die by the pursuit of their fortunes, rather than impose a burden on the whole economy. It's time to disentangle the trading of big financial institutions from their more traditional commercial banking operations and put an end to this unsafe business model.

Unfortunately, I am not optimistic. First we will need another global financial collapse—probably one bigger than what we experienced in 2008—to make this policy politically feasible. Second, we must close all the big, systemically dangerous institutions. They control policy-making and they have an unfair advantage over community banks. The subsidy offered to Goldman alone (in the form of insured deposits plus an obvious backstop that will prevent Goldman from failing no matter how bad its trades go) is worth tens of billions of dollars. Community banks cannot compete with that. There is no hope so long as Goldman et al remain in business.


Sometimes the best answer is “TINA”: there is no alternative. To shutting down the biggest banks. The next crisis—which could come any day now—will offer that opportunity. It would be foolish to waste another crisis.


 


L. Randall Wray is a Professor of Economics, University of Missouri—Kansas City. A student of Hyman Minsky, his research focuses on monetary and fiscal policy as well as unemployment and job creation. He writes a weekly column for Benzinga every Tuesday. He also blogs at New Economic Perspectives, and is a BrainTruster at New Deal 2.0. He is a senior scholar at the Levy Economics Institute, and has been a visiting professor at the University of Rome (La Sapienza), UNAM (Mexico City), University of Paris (South), and the University of Bologna (Italy).


From Peter Tchir of TF Market Advisors

The Countdown to Sovereign Debt Write-offs Has Started

Don’t be fooled by the IMF’s announcement that Greece will get a new round of money.  This bailout is merely to give a couple of months for the parties to seriously negotiate what haircuts and debt extensions investors need to take in Greece, and Ireland and Portugal.  Virtually all the comments made by the parties involved fit in with the view that we are now in a phase where people are negotiating how much they will write off and what else they will do.  Almost none of the comments indicate that anyone is really trying to put together a plan that is going kick the can down the road for a long time.  I am fading this rally as only the most optimistic investor can believe that this problem doesn’t lead to real default/restructuring with haircuts in the next couple of months.

Why do banks waive covenants?

It looks like Greece has failed to meet the criteria the IMF had set out to provide more money, yet the IMF seems intent on releasing the next tranche.  Banks typically waive covenants and release more money only when they truly believe the borrower will turn around, or when they extract enough value from the borrower that they feel safe making the new loan, or when they aren’t prepared to deal forcing the borrower into default. 

Does anyone really believe that Greece is going to get turned around?  I don’t.  In fact I am highly confident that Greece will still not meet the criteria the IMF has set out when it is time for the next tranche.  That will be the deadline for the default/restructuring.  The IMF can waive the covenants this time because shortly they get to review the progress again and can fail them at that time.

The IMF, which allegedly has some collateral for the loans it is making, be receiving even more collateral on this latest tranche?  Could they have perfected their security interests making their own loans extremely safe?  That is a real possibility.  If this next tranche only includes IMF money, or lending that is collateralized very specifically it would be another clear sign that the game has changed and the lenders are protecting their new loans at expense of existing bondholders.

Are the IMF, or the EU, or the ECB, or the banks prepared to deal with a default or real restructuring right now?  The answer clearly seems to be no, but it is also clear that over the past month, the EU in particular has realized restructuring, possibly with losses needs to occur.  Talk about the ‘Vienna accord’ and ‘voluntary private restructuring’ has become louder.  That will take time.  How do you easily pressure a bank into taking a loss, particularly while were still hopeful for a painless solution just a few weeks ago.  These ‘voluntary’ decisions won’t be so voluntary, but it will take time for the governments to convince their banks en masse to reach an agreement.

Waiving the covenants and providing the next tranche of IMF money, particularly if fully secured, is completely consistent with the idea that we have entered a relatively short period of negotiations leading to real restructuring.

Germany is laying the groundwork for real write-offs.

Germany was the first EU member to suggest private sector haircuts.  It has seemed more open to private sector losses than any other
government.  Not only has the German Finance Minister been outspoken on his desire to include the private sector in any package, but the Bundesbank issued a statement that it is confident that the Euro can withstand Greek default.  That was the first time in this crisis that a statement has come out trying to prepare the markets for a potential default.  As statement start to come out stating that the banking system is strong enough to withstand a default, you know someone is seriously considering a default.  I believe that this statement, which has been largely ignored, is a tell.  It is the first step in the process of trying to soften the market.

Against this, the ECB continues to lash out that restructuring/default is not an option.  At least that is how it seems on the surface.  A little below the surface and it seems like they are starting to take some steps to soften their stance.  First, and most importantly, Draghi seems to be the main spokesman.  Trichet seems to be quiet on the subject now.  Many people (at least me) blame Trichet for making the situation worse through the ECB’s wanton purchase of Greek (and Irish and Portuguese) bonds in the open market.  By bringing Draghi to the front line are they starting to distance themselves from ECB policy under Trichet?  Are they setting him up as a scapegoat?  It is plausible to me.  Then even looking more closely at what Draghi says also indicates a potential softening.  He says “The cost of a real default…”   What does he mean by real?  Is that to make it easier to wiggle out down the road and say whatever happens wasn’t a “real” default?

Germany seems to be moving further into private losses and preparing the markets for how contained those losses will be and the ECB is softening a bit and making it easier to blame its original stance on Trichet if they change their mind.

What about contagion risk?

There is real risk of contagion.  That is another reason that the EU/IMF/ECB need to buy a few more months because not only do they have to restructure Ireland and Portugal.  When the next plan is announced it will be comprehensive and Greece, Ireland, and Portugal will be included.  I had been surprised how quiet Ireland has been.  Other than being mentioned in general terms as part of a contagion argument, relatively few new specifics were being talked about.  Suddenly this week, here they are.  Allied Irish sub debt had a credit Event.  Noonan is speaking about haircuts for senior Allied Irish bondholders.  He is commenting on Greece.  It is not a coincidence in my mind that suddenly he is speaking out, as he is likely involved in this next phase of negotiations.  In fact, it seems that the number of finance ministers and ECB officials who are hitting the airwaves is expanding.  I assume if that many people feel the need to comment, something serious is going on behind the scenes.

Contagion risk is there, but it is being addressed so Greece, Ireland and Portugal can be sorted out at once, and the banks that would be in biggest trouble can get help if they need it.

The Government Changes in Greece Point to Default

You could argue that the changes to the Greek parliament are an attempt to get approval to jam another round of austerity on its people.  That could be, but I think it is more likely that Prime Minister Papandreou does not want to be labeled as the man who put Greece in default or who crushed the Euro, so he is trying to escape that role, or drag others into a group to share the blame.  He is clearly politically savvy, he was an MD at Goldman, and prime minister.  If I was him I would be trying to do things so that my name doesn’t go down in history as the person who broke the Euro.

Banks Can’t Handle the Defaults

I really think most banks can handle the defaults.  The most likely outcome, in my opinion, is there is some amount of permanent debt reduction and any remaining debt has its maturity extended for a long time.  The banks that aren’t mark to market would have to take a loss on any permanent reduction in principal but there is no reason they have to take a loss on any debt that they extend the maturity.  So if a bank took 100 million of 2 year bonds, and exchanged them for 80 million of 10 year bonds, they would take a write off of 20 million.  That seems manageable for most banks (and the governments can directly support any bank that can’t handle it).  From a stock price perspective, no one is buying the stocks of banks with big exposure to Greece, Ireland, and Portugal, on the basis that they don’t have impairments in the portfolio.  Given where debt is currently trading, and how much of the write off is permanent, and the trading price of new bonds, bank stocks may rally.  I occasionally read articles about banks trading below book value as being cheap.  I usually stop there because I believe smart investors try to figure out the value of the banks holdings are not easily fooled by non mark to market accounting.  If I am correct, the banks will have some big losses, their share prices may not react much, and the various EU countries can bailout their own banks directly if they choose to.

CDS?

A subject that will get its own write-up,  but from the data available from the DTCC, concerns about CDS on sovereigns seems overblown, even if there is a Credit Event.  Of all the subjects written about, the only that seems to get the least accurate treatment is the potential impact of CDS on the outcome.  The problem is a debt problem.  The bulk of all losses will result from poor lending and bond buying decisions.  CDS will spread some gains and losses around, but will not in itself have a meaningful impact on the market.  Trying to compare AIG is wrong as AIG had almost nothing to do with single name CDS and had ridiculously loose collateral terms even by the 2007 standards, let alone today. Lehman, with massive amounts of debt saw its CDS settle with little confusion, and the market dealt pretty well with the loss of Lehman as counterparty on so many CDS trades.  There were more surprising losses from things as simple as repo agreements than from its role as CDS market maker. 





Make Money Online System by Ann Liu


<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

Among the many shocking facts that have emerged from the News of the World hacking crisis, it is the revelations about News International's dysfunctional leadership and the NoW's brutal organizational culture that have ...

<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

The company's stock price has dropped since the revelations of a wider phone hacking scandal at News of the World.

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

We already know that the News of the World hacked the phones of virtually everyone in England, including dead people and the prime minister and, probably, you. But with the latest revelation, the scandal has actually ...

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

mercy bobby ferguson

<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

Among the many shocking facts that have emerged from the News of the World hacking crisis, it is the revelations about News International's dysfunctional leadership and the NoW's brutal organizational culture that have ...

<b>News</b> International&#39;s Leadership Crisis - Gill Corkindale - Harvard <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

The company's stock price has dropped since the revelations of a wider phone hacking scandal at News of the World.

<b>News</b> Corporation Looks to Bolster Stock With Buyback Plan <b>...</b>

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

We already know that the News of the World hacked the phones of virtually everyone in England, including dead people and the prime minister and, probably, you. But with the latest revelation, the scandal has actually ...

<b>News</b> of the World Hacked Cops Investigating <b>News</b> of the World Hacking

nebraska bobby ferguson